Research Unit in Networking  

Abstract 
G. Leduc^{1} ^{1} Research unit in Networking, EECS department, University of Liège, Belgium (1991) AbstractWe first study the conf relation proposed by E. Brinksma and G. Scollo to formalise testing conformance. It is wellknown from their work that, in order to test whether an implementation of a specification S (i.e. I conf S), it suffices to build, from S, a canonical tester T(S) such that, when T(S) is synchronised with an implementation I, it always reaches a correct final state if, and only if, I conf S. For instance, if I is not a valid implementation of S, the canonical tester T(S) may deadlock with I before reaching a correct final state. We put into evidence the role of the equivalence relation, confeq, associated naturally with conf. An important result states that if S1 conf S2, their canonical testers T1 and T2 must also satisfy T1 confeq T2, and reversely. Therefore, the best approach is to define the canonical tester modulo confeq, whereas it is currently defined modulo the testing equivalence te. Taking into account that confeq is weaker than te, we were able to propose a minimum canonical tester which is simpler than T(S): unlike T(S), it may have fewer traces than the specification S. The term minimum means that no trace from this tester can be deleted without losing the exhaustive test property or, stated otherwise, without taking the risk of accepting an invalid implementation (in the conf sense). 

Editor:  G. Leduc  Webmaster:  C. Soldani  
Still running IPv4 at: 54.225.3.207... 
RUN 
Montefiore 
ULg © 20002015. 